NY TIMESの要約を読んでみよう! Vol.167 / Global-C
くらし > 英語
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
■■■ NY Timesの記事 ■■■
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
題名: In the West, a Fierce Battle Over Wolves
記者: By KIRK JOHNSON
発行日: April 13, 2008
URL: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/13/us/13wolves.html
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
【Passage/本文】
About 1,500 wolves inhabit Wyoming, Montana and
Idaho, most of them descended from 66 wolves
introduced into Yellowstone National Park
and central Idaho in the mid-1990s.
Since March, the wolf was taken off the list of
federally protected species and Wyoming, Montana and Idaho have planned their first wolf trophy hunting
seasons this fall.
State management plans allow for wolf hunting -or in
some places, outright eradication -with a target
population of 150 in each of the three states.
A fierce battle has unfolded on the Web and in the
news media as pro-wolf and anti-wolf forces argue
where animals and humans should exist.
One wolf lover in California, in a forum posting on
the Web site Yellowstone.net, proposed that tourists
boycott Wyoming to protest the policies in a state
where at least 10 wolves were shot in the first week
after the rule change.
Some Wyoming residents responded that such an action
would be just fine with them, especially if more
Californian tourists stayed home.
On the first day protection status was lifted, a
partly crippled and much photographed radio-collared
wolf named 253M was legally shot near the town of
Daniel in western Wyoming.
The wolf made headlines as far away as Utah, where
253M had wandered in 2002, before being transported
back to Wyoming.
A story in The Salt Lake Tribune quoted a woman as
saying she had wept at the news of the animal's death.
Some anti-wolf ranchers and hunters urge caution in
killing wolves unnecessarily, to avoid inflaming
emotions that could haunt the legal process later.
The legal aspect is connected to the emotional and
the political, and a judge is not immune.
In April, a coalition of environmental groups has
said it will to go federal court challenging the
decision to lift the wolves protected status.
今日のトピックは如何でしたか？
狼とかどの動物を保護するのかしないのかは、人間の作為的なこととなり、
自然の掟を乱すようでMarkはあまり好きではありません。
■■■ NY Timesの記事 ■■■
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
題名: In the West, a Fierce Battle Over Wolves
記者: By KIRK JOHNSON
発行日: April 13, 2008
URL: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/13/us/13wolves.html
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
【Passage/本文】
About 1,500 wolves inhabit Wyoming, Montana and
Idaho, most of them descended from 66 wolves
introduced into Yellowstone National Park
and central Idaho in the mid-1990s.
Since March, the wolf was taken off the list of
federally protected species and Wyoming, Montana and Idaho have planned their first wolf trophy hunting
seasons this fall.
State management plans allow for wolf hunting -or in
some places, outright eradication -with a target
population of 150 in each of the three states.
A fierce battle has unfolded on the Web and in the
news media as pro-wolf and anti-wolf forces argue
where animals and humans should exist.
One wolf lover in California, in a forum posting on
the Web site Yellowstone.net, proposed that tourists
boycott Wyoming to protest the policies in a state
where at least 10 wolves were shot in the first week
after the rule change.
Some Wyoming residents responded that such an action
would be just fine with them, especially if more
Californian tourists stayed home.
On the first day protection status was lifted, a
partly crippled and much photographed radio-collared
wolf named 253M was legally shot near the town of
Daniel in western Wyoming.
The wolf made headlines as far away as Utah, where
253M had wandered in 2002, before being transported
back to Wyoming.
A story in The Salt Lake Tribune quoted a woman as
saying she had wept at the news of the animal's death.
Some anti-wolf ranchers and hunters urge caution in
killing wolves unnecessarily, to avoid inflaming
emotions that could haunt the legal process later.
The legal aspect is connected to the emotional and
the political, and a judge is not immune.
In April, a coalition of environmental groups has
said it will to go federal court challenging the
decision to lift the wolves protected status.
今日のトピックは如何でしたか？
狼とかどの動物を保護するのかしないのかは、人間の作為的なこととなり、
自然の掟を乱すようでMarkはあまり好きではありません。
